Applying NOX Error Mitigation Protocols to Calculate Real-time Quantum Field Theory Scattering Phase Shifts

Real-time scattering calculations on a Noisy Intermediate Scale Quantum (NISQ) quantum computer are disrupted by errors that accumulate throughout the circuits. To improve the accuracy of such physics simulations, one can supplement the application circuits with a recent error mitigation strategy known as Noisy Output eXtrapolation (NOX). We tested these error mitigation protocols on a Transverse Field Ising model and improved upon previous calculations of the phase shift. Our proof-of-concept 4-qubit application circuits were run on several IBM quantum computing hardware architectures. Metrics were introduced that show between 21\% and 74\% error reduction for circuit depths ranging from 14 to 37 hard cycles, confirming that the NOX technique applies to circuits with a broad range of failure rates. This observation on different cloud-accessible devices further confirms that NOX provides performance improvements even in the advent where circuits are executed in substantially time-separated batches. Finally, we provide a heuristic method to obtain systematic error bars on the mitigated results, compare them with empirical errors and discuss their effects on phase shift estimates.Comment: 11 pages, 7 figure

Campus Bridging: Campus Leadership Engagement in Building a Coherent Campus Cyberinfrastructure Workshop Report

This report presents the discussions at and recommendations made at “Campus Leadership Engagement in Building a Coherent Campus Cyberinfrastructure,” a workshop held in Anaheim, California from October 10-12, 2010. The main goals for this workshop focused on gathering the thoughts, ideas and perspectives of senior university administrators. The resulting report covers the topics of: - The current state of campus bridging from the perspectives of the CIO and VP for Research. - Challenges and opportunities at the campus leader level for enablement of campus bridging in the university community. - The senior campus leadership advocacy role for promoting campus bridging.This workshop and preparation of this report and related documents were supported by several sources, including: National Science Foundation through grant #OCI-1059812 (Patrick Dreher PI; Craig A. Stewart; James Pepin; Guy Almes; Michael Mundrane Co-PIs) (Co-Principal Investigator) RENCI (the Renaissance Computing Institute, http://www.renci.org/) supported this workshop and report by generously providing the time and effort of Patrick Dreher and through underwriting of this effort by RENCI Director Stanley Ahalt Indiana University Pervasive Technology Institute (http://pti.iu.edu/) for funding staff providing logistical support of the task force activities, writing and editorial staff, and layout and production of the final report document. Texas A&M University (http://www.tamu.edu) supported this workshop and report by generously providing the time and effort of Guy Almes. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation, the Indiana University Pervasive Technology Institute, or Indiana University

Final report on accomplishments of a Task Force on Campus Bridging sponsored workshop: Campus Leadership Engagement in Building a Coherent Campus Cyberinfrastructure

In 2010, the National Science Foundation (NSF) awarded a grant of $49,840 to the University of North Carolina Chapel Hill to organize a workshop on the topic of campus cyberinfrastructure with the title “Campus Bridging Taskforce Sponsored Workshop: Campus Leadership Engagement in Building a Coherent Campus Cyberinfrastructure.” This report discusses the contents of the full workshop report to the NSF as well as the accomplishments and outcomes reported via the NSF’s online reporting system.This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation (NSF) under Grant No. 1059812 to the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, with Patrick Dreher as principal investigator and Craig Stewart, James Pepin, Guy Almes, and Michael Mundrane as co-principal investigators. Stewart’s involvement was supported by the Indiana University Pervasive Technology Institute, which is supported in part by the Lilly Endowment, Inc. (a private charitable trust). Any opinions, findings and conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s), and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NSF or the Lilly Endowment

Developing a Coherent Cyberinfrastructure from Local Campus to National Facilities: Challenges and Strategies

A fundamental goal of cyberinfrastructure (CI) is the integration of computing hardware, software, and network technology, along with data, information management, and human resources to advance scholarship and research. Such integration creates opportunities for researchers, educators, and learners to share ideas, expertise, tools, and facilities in new and powerful ways that cannot be realized if each of these components is applied independently. Bridging the gap between the reality of CI today and its potential in the immediate future is critical to building a balanced CI ecosystem that can support future scholarship and research. This report summarizes the observations and recommendations from a workshop in July 2008 sponsored by the EDUCAUSE Net@EDU Campus Cyberinfrastructure Working Group (CCI) and the Coalition for Academic Scientific Computation (CASC). The invitational workshop was hosted at the University Place Conference Center on the IUPUI campus in Indianapolis. Over 50 individuals representing a cross-section of faculty, senior campus information technology leaders, national lab directors, and other CI experts attended. The workshop focused on the challenges that must be addressed to build a coherent CI from the local to the national level, and the potential opportunities that would result. Both the organizing committee and the workshop participants hope that some of the ideas, suggestions, and recommendations in this report will take hold and be implemented in the community. The goal is to create a better, more supportive, more usable CI environment in the future to advance both scholarship and research